With the exact phrase

Sentence examples for with the exact phrase from inspiring English sources

» With the exact phrase «: Here you enter a phrase that you want to show up in the results.

While the exact phrase «baptism with the Holy Spirit» is not found in the New Testament, two forms of the phrase are found in the canonical gospels using the verb «baptize».

Just like with regular emoji, you can also mix and match any of these to convey the exact phrase you are hoping to get across.

A Google search of the exact phrase produces more than 390,000 results.

Murrow used a similar phrase in his Columbia LP recording «I Can Hear It Now, 1933-1945,» released in 1948, and used the exact phrase in 1954.

Although Kierkegaard never used the exact phrase , «the leap of faith,» those words have become his shibboleth.

… The exact phrase ‘separation of church and state’ came out of Adolf Hitler’s mouth, that’s where it comes from.

Ludwig at its best

English sentences from reliable sources

Need more results?




Used by millions of students, scientific researchers, professional translators and editors from all over the world!

Awesome tool! I started using it one year ago and I never had to look for another app

MA of Applied Linguistic, Maquarie University, Australia
English teacher at Nói Tiéng Anh Chuån, Vietnam

What is Ludwig?

Ludwig is the first sentence search engine that helps you write better English by giving you contextualized examples taken from reliable sources.


Exact Words

Edit Locked

When the exact wording of a rule, promise, prophecy, etc. matters more than the spirit of the wording, it’s an Exact Words situation.

The Knight Templar, the Anti-Hero, and those with even looser standards (but some standards) will often stick to Exact Words even as they declare I Gave My Word. A common trait of Lawful Evil characters. Also a common (and not always evil) way to play with Just Following Orders or the Leonine Contract. Undercover heroes often tell the Big Bad that «Your operation is very impressive, and you deserve everything that’s coming to you» — both of which are true, without specifying what exactly is coming their way. Often, a user of Exact Words will parrot the specific wording of the agreement, smugly or matter-of-factly, when confronted about their duplicity, in order to taunt the other person or point out that they technically didn’t lie.

The Obstructive Bureaucrat will insist on them as if the Vast Bureaucracy would fall apart if exceptions were made. The Beleaguered Bureaucrat will often insist on them, when the exceptions really would be a problem.

For magical enforcement, see Literal Genie. Often the cause of Prophecy Twist. Literal-Minded characters just do it because that’s how they think. Can be defended against with Legalese, though might be used (and horribly abused) by a Rules Lawyer. If someone follows established rules to annoy someone else, it becomes Bothering by the Book. If this trope is related to or defines a superpower, it’s called a Semantic Superpower.

In the case of prophecies and prophecy twists, Fridge Logic kicks in, leading one to wonder what the heck the prophet actually saw, and why would the prophet word it as such?

A Sub-Trope of Double Meaning. Compare Heroic Vow, I Would Say If I Could Say, Technical Euphemism, and Ironic Echo. Unhand Them, Villain! is a specific variant. Threat Backfire is a common result. It’s very commonly used in False Reassurance. The actual interpretation of the words is often Not Hyperbole. When used in response to a question can often result in a Mathematician’s Answer. Can also lead to a Literal Metaphor, Literal Money Metaphor and to Literalist Snarking, as well as Loophole Abuse. Also see No Man of Woman Born. Contrast with I Lied, for when the opposing party makes no effort to hide the fact that they were not holding to their end. Not to be confused with Literal-Minded. Often a very important part of the Comically Wordy Contract, but easy to overlook because the contract is so damned wordy.

Читайте также:  Как проверить водонагреватель мультиметром через вилку

In Real Life doing this with instructions (for example, in your workplace), is called «malicious compliance» or «working to rule.» It’s a form of striking often used by health care workers and others in industries where refusing to work would put lives at risk. Instructions have to be painstakingly worded such that someone who has no idea what they are doing can complete the task reasonably well. If an experienced worker decides to follow every detail of every instruction, work grinds to almost a halt. But of course, since you’ve technically complied with all instructions the company can’t fire you for incompetance or insubordination. The Exact Words are also the difference between a riddle and a mere common question.


Google for the exact phrase (and no, quotation marks don’t help)

Simple question. How can I google for the exact phrase match?

Making a simple google of this, it says «use quotation marks».

Well I did that just now. I searched for this: «accuracy map» and I get a lot of results for map accuracy which is not what I am looking for.

Is there a way to google for the exact phrase with the exact order?

8 Answers 8


Even better combining «both worlds»

Your best bet to minimize to most relevant results is to use:

opposed to the by Google recommended

You can try the word or phrase you want, a space, then one or more things that you want to exclude, each of these prefixed with a minus sign, using quotes where necessary e.g.

«accuracy map» -«map accuracy»

england -Wikipedia -BBC -football -«shielding and protecting» -«Visitors from EU countries»

As well as using the double quotes, after searching click on the «Tools» button on the right under the search box.

You should see options for «Any country», «Any time», and «All results». Click the last one, and there’s an option to change it to «Verbatim».

This should now only show results which contain exactly what you typed (although Google seem to go out of their way to show you what they think you want instead of what you ask for).

I’ve just tested it for «accuracy map» and it seems to work. But only for the organic search results — things like the «People also search for» box, and the related searches list don’t seem to respect the «Verbatim» setting


Shouldn’t «the exact same» always be «exactly the same»?

I’ve always avoided using the common phrase «the exact same» because it sounds incorrect to me (unless perhaps a comma were inserted thus: «the exact, same».) Shouldn’t «the exact same» be «exactly the same»?

11 Answers 11

According to these Google Ngrams, both American and British English use exactly the same more than the exact same. Here is the usage in American English:

Despite its usage, the exact same is considered informal (but is not deemed incorrect) by this site at Washington State University:

In casual speech we often say things like, “The fruitcake he gave me was the exact same one I’d given him last Christmas,” but in formal English the phrase is “exactly the same.”

However, there is a long discussion of the phrase which writes that:

The traditional construction is “exactly the same time,” with an adverb (“exactly”) properly modifying an adjective (“same”).

Critics of a phrase like “the exact same time” condemn it because “exact” (an adjective) is being used as an adverb (like “very”).

Читайте также:  Измерение потерь холостого тока трансформатора

Proponents of the phrase note, however:

Elsewhere, the Cambridge Grammar notes that noun phrases including “the same” often include modifiers to reflect varying degrees of sameness. Sometime modifiers come after “the” (as in “the very same mistake”), and sometimes before, as with “much,” “almost,” “roughly,” and “exactly.”

I would add “exact” to the list of modifiers that can follow “the” (as in “the exact same mistake”). In my opinion, this usage is acceptable in all but the most formal writing.

If you’d like another authority, The Columbia Guide to Standard American English also says “exact same” is “standard in all but the most formal and oratorical contexts.”

Both phrases are redundant, and the exact same can be considered correct or not depending on which style guide one subscribes to. An American English grammar guide specifically mentions that the phrase is mostly standard, and a British English guide notes that there are similar phrases. So use depends on context: in formal writing, avoid it, but in anything else the exact same can be (again, it depends on who you follow) acceptable.

I can imagine a slight difference.

Mike’s car is exactly the same car as Jennifer’s.

So, Mike got the same make, model, color, and accessories as Jennifer did.

Mike’s car is the exact same car as Jennifer’s.

Mike’s car not only looks like Jennifer’s car, it is Jennifer’s car. Maybe Mike bought it or borrowed it or stole it from Jennifer.

In British English, yes. «The exact same» sounds (to my British ears, at least) like an American phrase.

It seems to me like «same» is being treated as a noun in this case and «exact» is an adjective, where both entities are being compared to a single noun «the exact same».

Mike’s car and Jennifer’s car are both the right car.

Mike’s car and Jennifer’s car are the exact same.

The expression the exact same [X] can often be heard in US informal speech (TV dramas are rife with it), whereas (in my experience) it is still something of a rarity in the UK.

Sloppy? Perhaps it is — but then again, it is the norm for spoken language to be the product of imperfect improvisation.

«Exact same» should be identical, in the same way that «At that point in time» should be «Then».

My mother wore the exact same suit that she was married in on their anniversary for 30 years.

The two women could not have worn the exact same outfits at the same time to the party. Identical outfits would not be identical after one had been worn. Ask any bloodhound.

I avoided using «exact same» until SSA Dr. Spencer Reid used it on «Criminal Minds».

People use the word ‘same’ in sentences like ‘the same car’ (where same is an adjective and will take adverbs) or ‘I’d like the same!’ (where same is a pronoun and will take adjectives).

Читайте также:  Как это зажим ягодиц

The problem is that sometimes people use the word same as a pronoun (by putting adjectives in front of it) when they use it in front of another noun. In front of another noun, though, it can only be an adjective and not a pronoun.

In its adjective form, it cannot take adjectives — only adverbs, like any adjective at that.

Examples (not the best ones, but I hope they make my point): ‘The taxi you and I used on new year’s eve was the exact same!’ (pronoun) ‘On new year’s eve you and I used exactly the same taxi!’ (adjective)

Conclusion: when used together with another noun, it’s an adjective and must be garnished as such.

I’ll explain my views on this, ending with a conclusion.

First off, ‘the exact same’ is a tautology — a redundancy. There is no need to add the word ‘exact’ when you’ve already said ‘the same’ or vice versa. For example, we say »it’s the same car I saw yesterday», OR »it’s the exact car I saw yesterday». In other words, ‘the exact’ and ‘the same’ have the same function. I would argue that combining these two phrases could even confuse people who aren’t native speakers of English, in that they’ll start wondering if there is a difference between ‘the same’ and ‘the exact’, or they could even start assuming the two words always mean the same thing regardless of context.

Secondly, English doesn’t use adverbs as adjectives (except in the case of weekly, hourly, etc) probably precisely because it can get confusing. It does use adjectives as adverbs sometimes — in the case of ‘drive fast’, which I believe is also not accepted by most language authorities, but this usage can at least be understandable. I think a case can be made for it being an acceptable usage, but that’s a discussion for another time.

The phrase »the exact same» is, technically speaking, wrong. The only reason why it is considered acceptable, is because it is now in common usage.

I am no grammar expert. However, I am fairly confident that in this case, those who use the phrase «exact same» are not speaking good English.

There are two distinct problems with the ubiquitous (and incorrect) phrase «exact same.» This is a case of a mistake being made by so often by so many people that others begin to believe that it is not a mistake. However, sometimes in a vote of 100 who vote «yes» and a single person who votes «no,» the sole person who stands against the 100 is in the right, and everyone else is in the wrong.

One distinction between the phrases, «exact same,» and «exactly the same» is that the that former phrase contains two mistakes, whereas the latter phrase contains only one. Both of these phrases have a problem with redundancy. However, at least the phrase «exactly the same» is grammatically correct. The phrase «exact same» is one of the more irritating phrases that is currently fashionable. Not only does it use words redundantly, but it is also wrong grammatically.

The word «ain’t» is also used very often. However, both «ain’t and «exact same» are incorrect English, irrespective of whether the speaker is in England, the USA, or any other English speaking country. Yes, many people make these mistakes, and, yes, many people understand the gist of what the speaker means. But, this is not enough to make the usage of «ain’t, or «exact same» correct. Neither can be considered good English.


Оцените статью